Time to remove the red trust system and rely upon flags.
Let me guess: your main account has negative feedback, but no Flags yet?
There's a lot wrong with the Trust system, but one example of 1 user changing something won't make it in my Top 10.
Your speculation is incorrect and off topic.
Your comment demonstrates you do not have the forums best interests at heart. It further demonstrates you have no understanding of the intended purpose of a trust system.
It is a statement of truth. That if you do not have clear objective evidence of scamming or attempting to / setting up a scam, all other information is subjective personal noise that serves only to dilute and destroy the credibility of the trust score.
There are many other clear examples of red trust being given that are clearly for personal grievances. Those are more than enough reaason to abolish a system that provides no additional benefit.
I have seen no credible argument that demonstrates the old red trust system is now anything other than a tool for manipulation rather than to protect the members of our forum from being scammed.
The point being made by the poster directly above is not relevant. If you claim you are sure someone is dangerous and a scammer, forgiveness is not a factor. You don't mutually then both claim that other members do not deserve a warning now that those claiming you were a dangerous scammer decided to make a truce. If someone has scammed or been dangerous then it is impossible to reason they should have tags removed for recently playing ball.
This is exactly why subjective personal opions are not to be tolerated.
Those arguing against the requisite of objective evidence of scamming or strong evidence of attempting or setting up a scam need to present their argument.