Post
Topic
Board Meta
Merits 2 from 1 user
Re: Accusation topic removed?
by
Blacknavy
on 14/02/2020, 10:32:57 UTC
⭐ Merited by Vispilio (2)

This image proves that this user is banned after posting allegations, it's crazy  Roll Eyes
Only newbie accounts can be nuked by moderators AFAIK
Oppose this problem, only new created account can be nuked, this account has existed since 5 months ago, so this seems ridiculous.
I found it difficult to understand when Neopotism disappeared and his allegations were locked. I support his allegation based on the archive you provided
I had suspected previously Blacknavy about sending merit accounts to some accounts, but in the end, the investigation didn't happen when I received explanation from eddie13
How so?
It looks like Blacknavy is a source and he sends multiple merit TXs to a single account in a row often.. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=1018510
What's wrong with that?
But now, with all the evidence provided, I have a strong belief that Blacknavy owns many accounts, and he also sends merit to his altaccount with the word as a source of merit.

In the worst case where we don't get a response from the administrator, I think we should create a new thread to continue the allegations.

The post that you sent is off-topic.
Your account has been stolen and you still haven't got a red tag because you're an alt account of one of the shooters. In Bitcointalk, there are several greedy criminals who defame other ones to eliminate them in signature campaigns. You and some of the DT members do not hesitate to defame users for your financial interests. Shooters/Criminals made a lot of Bitcoin because they have been abusing high-paid sig camps which pay 0.0375 btc in a week but, puppies never deserve more than 50 bucks. Normal users can’t predict how many accounts gangs have, every defamation you put on people is actually what you do for your own gang (DT manipulation, distrusts, red trust, trading merits). Bitcointalk users “THE REAL BITCOIN INVESTORS” must see what is going on this forum.

I didn't understand why some DT members defame us in the local election a year ago. It turned out in recent months that the people I think are reliable are actually a gang member. They are just acting their roles (good cops, bad cops). They are not interested in Bitcoin, they are even not an investor, they just want to keep their DT status to join high-paid signature campaigns.

Each local boards ‘MUST ADD PEOPLE WHO ARE REALLY TRUSTWORTHY ON THEIR TRUST LIST” to fight against this gangs. The gang members OBVIOUSLY harmed many RESPECTED MEMBERS (the real Bitcoin supporters) financially.

They always send posts about the new default trust system. It is a keyword, they are afraid of losing their FAKE respected status because they are the authority here. They have been abusing the DT system by adding their alts in their trust lists. Thus, they have an infinite number of reliable account pools.