Ok, lol. Funny topic timing right after WHATEVERBABY2 shill joined here.
Again, deception. Martin barely ever makes clear distinction in his blogs whether it's him making a prediction, or Socrates. So it's mostly up to readers to figure it out. Of course, in hindsight, he might let us know who it was making a prediction, lol.
Ok well, you might argue I accuse him of being wrong personally, but simply because I don't believe that he has a computer as he portraits it in the first place.
Yes yes, Socrates is amazing. Keep parroting it so that cult members don't forget it.
Confidence in Martin Armstrong into the abyss
Marty, you've reached your peak, right on schedule of course
@WHATEVERBABY2's pathetic posts were by far the worst shilling attempt to date, which indicates a clear shift in the trend.
@m96, @WHATEVERBABY2, @over45 et al...
IF YOU ARE NOT INTERESTED IN GETTING ANY CREDIBILITY, OR GETTING THE "TRUTH" OUT
THEN WHAT THE HECK ARE YOU DOING HERE IN THE FIRST PLACE?
We heard all of your nonsense throughout the 360 pages here. You are not original, it's getting tiresome. Present facts and evidence, argue certain points (be specific) or kindly stop spamming the thread.
Currently you are nothing but a waste of everyone's bandwidth and time.
One of the more fascinating things is when people try to challenge me as an analyst and pretend it is a personal confrontation to try to prove me wrong personally. I have stated many times, whenever I have had a personal opinion that has been counter to Socrates, it is me who has always been wrong. As humans, we simply do not always see everything. We miss things taking place around the world or maybe too focused on one personal perspective.
Again, deception. Martin barely ever makes clear distinction in his blogs whether it's him making a prediction, or Socrates. So it's mostly up to readers to figure it out. Of course, in hindsight, he might let us know who it was making a prediction, lol.
Ok well, you might argue I accuse him of being wrong personally, but simply because I don't believe that he has a computer as he portraits it in the first place.
Socrates writes over 1,000 reports e4ach day covering global stocks, bonds, commodities, real estate, and interest rates. These are ALL entirely written by the computer NOT me. There is no human interaction. This is entirely Socrates. I find it so funny when people try to say of Armstrong will be wrong or whatever for they fail to understand this is the next evolution in the analysis. The greatest error in all analysis is human bias and the failure to see things from an objectives viewpoint.
Yes yes, Socrates is amazing. Keep parroting it so that cult members don't forget it.
Confidence in Martin Armstrong into the abyss
Marty, you've reached your peak, right on schedule of course
@WHATEVERBABY2's pathetic posts were by far the worst shilling attempt to date, which indicates a clear shift in the trend.
@m96, @WHATEVERBABY2, @over45 et al...
IF YOU ARE NOT INTERESTED IN GETTING ANY CREDIBILITY, OR GETTING THE "TRUTH" OUT
THEN WHAT THE HECK ARE YOU DOING HERE IN THE FIRST PLACE?
We heard all of your nonsense throughout the 360 pages here. You are not original, it's getting tiresome. Present facts and evidence, argue certain points (be specific) or kindly stop spamming the thread.
Currently you are nothing but a waste of everyone's bandwidth and time.