Here he goes again:
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/future-forecasts/me-v-socrates/Me v Socrates
Blog/Forecasts
Posted Feb 14, 2020 by Martin Armstrong
One of the more fascinating things is when people try to challenge me as an analyst and pretend it is a personal confrontation to try to prove me wrong personally. I have stated many times, whenever I have had a personal opinion that has been counter to Socrates, it is me who has always been wrong. As humans, we simply do not always see everything. We miss things taking place around the world or maybe too focused on one personal perspective.
Socrates writes over 1,000 reports each day covering global stocks, bonds, commodities, real estate, and interest rates. These are ALL entirely written by the computer NOT me. There is no human interaction. This is entirely Socrates. I find it so funny when people try to say oh Armstrong will be wrong or whatever for they fail to understand this is the next evolution in the analysis. The greatest error in all analysis is human bias and the failure to see things from an objective viewpoint.
Well okay Marty, if you're so convinced Socrates is infallible and that your opinions are not so good (despite calling yourself "The Forecaster"), then stop posting these constant (wrong) predictions about the direction of the markets completely and let Socrates handle everything. Oh wait, that's not gonna happen will it? Nevertheless, it's already proven in this thread that Socrates is at best a horrible after-the-fact trend following program. Well at least Marty has admitted now that his opinions are almost worthless and that it would be better if he stopped making predictions about the markets. Touché.