I didn't follow that BestChange thread and don't really know what the drama there is about, though I did take a peek and saw that they're not using an escrow--but in any case my opinion is this:  DT members rotate through and there's been a lot of change as far as what the list looks like, and no member is going to exhibit perfect characteristics of what it should mean to be on DT. 

So even if Royse777 changed some of his feedback and excluded a member for personal reasons, so what?  We've seen DT members do that before, many times.  DT members have been known to engage in vendettas and all sorts of other crap--but as long as their judgement is usually very good, and bad judgement isn't a pattern I don't see what the problem is.  So I think Royse777 is totally fine on DT unless someone can point me to an egregious error that he made, but I don't think there is one.

If you feel like it, can you drop me a PM with some info on why he might not be a good fit for DT (or post it here)?  It's hard to glean the facts with all the vitriol flying about.