A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted.
I am not closing any thread, sorry. Unfortunately you will be seeing this thread for as long as it takes to have this false accusation neutralized, so enjoy the fruits of your labor. I am ready for the long haul. How about you?
I will neutralize any false accusations right away! Did you post a PM of a user because they stopped chatting with you? Did you then lie about it? The quote is in the reference link.
I suggest everyone simply ignore you, so your threat to disrupt the forum for the "long haul" is neutralized, and we get on with our lives.

Could you do me one favor? Could you reply, denying you have ever done anything wrong, and use as many words as possible to justify your sig payment? Thx.
I posted a PM because the Hhampuz was insinuating I was PMing him abusive messages to justify his spineless behavior toward me because he was fearful of being drawn into the retribution thirsty mob of people of which you are a member. This is the same reason he refuses to comment on the situation now, he fears retribution for speaking the truth of the matter and derailing your obviously retaliatory and frivolous negative rating, on his behalf, with the truth.
Last I checked Hhampuz had me included on his trust list and had left a positive rating for me. Seems like odd behavior for some one you claim I some how in some undefined way caused damage to doesn't it Vod? Why is it that you care more about this than he does? Oh that's right, it is all you can muster to find even the most flimsy excuse for negative rating me in retribution for leaving you a perfectly justified rating for the publicly documented doxing of another user, in an obvious attempt at extorting me into removing it.
There was nothing controversial or secret about anything in the message, and the entire point of it was simply to demonstrate that we shared a friendly tone at the time. As you could see in the thread the you and the usual clowns were laying the pretext for this frivolous rating for later use by immediately trying to turn it into some crime. This whole accusation is just a sad excuse for you to get retribution, and this pathetic pretext is the best you could come up with.
I never lied about it, and your claims to that effect are yet more manipulation and deceitful accusations on your part in a pathetic attempt to try to inflate the importance of your accusations against me because you know very well they are weak as fuck. Tell me Vod, how am I "disrupting the forum" by challenging your and Nullus's obvious abuse of the trust system?
FYI, I get a flat fee for my signature with zero posting requirements. I know you are exceptionally thirsty to try to latch on to any little thing you can to impugn my character, but this is exceptionally pathetic. This isn't going to work out for you Vod, just like it didn't work out for you the last 3 or 4 times you abused the trust system against me and were forced to remove your ratings.
Now that we have covered that frivolous rating, what about the others? Do you have any substantiation whatsoever that I was "manipulating the trust?" It seems you are simply basing your accusation off of another baseless accusation from another user with clear animus against me, and nullius is basing his accusation off of yours, no one substantiating anything all through the whole process. You all sure sound like reliable unbias folk that wouldn't abuse the trust this community puts in you to retaliate and serve your own petty personal vendettas to me!
Can you name something that I've done against you Hhampuz? You've been awfully quiet in Meta for awhile now, but after going from trusting me to distrusting me without any explanation - here you are making it seem like you've been being harassed by me. Either your post is irrelevant or it's fan-fiction, can you help me pick which?
I don't lump people together in attempts to stir up drama. When I say "the ones calling "them" out" it necessarily doesn't mean you.
I've decided not to disclose why I Add/Remove/Exclude people from my trust list as someone will always be angry and send you nasty messages.
Quite convenient you never need to explain yourself because feels.
And why exactly would he have to explain himself?
Maybe because publicly he insinuated I was sending him nasty messages and privately we had perfectly friendly conversations and his public and private persona are inconsistent.
Hey there. Just wanted to maybe give you a friendly warning, this whole VOD thing is going to have fallout, he went way too far. I would advise you to disassociate yourself from him and this event. Again this is just a friendly suggestion as I see it this is going to go south pretty quick. If you would like I can talk to TeeGumes we have done trades in the past. If you were to first make a statement to the fact disassociating from this it would probably help me go a long way toward arguing for him to remove the rating. I don't agree with him leaving it, but I don't think what VOD did was at all acceptable either. Feel free to let me know what you think about all of this, or not if you want. Have a good one.
Hey Tecshare,
Thank you for reaching out, hope you are enjoying this
BTC rally too!
I understand that me leaving merit to that thread may have been stupid and my judgement was clouded by my disliking of og. There is no way for me to remove merit but even if it were, as the thread stands right now, I'm not sure I would remove it. No need to argue on my behalf with teegumes, although it is much appreciated! I'll take his neg and wear it as a reminder to always think twice before taking any action here which can also be a good thing.
After beeing down and feeling shit for a couple of months I've come back now and have found joy in the small things, doing much better and will just try and be hard at work.
Again, thank you for reaching out, I appreciate it

. Hope you are doing ok, too!
WOW. MUCH NASTY! SO ANGER!
With the given situation you are in the red tag Lauda gave to you is justifiable, your account is obviously created to complain about the DT system and it's probably you are one of the members who got tagged by a DT member one way or another. Based from what I have seen DT members are more lenient and understanding to high ranking members or at least the trustworthy ones since they have the balls to complain about it in their own account unlike you who just created an alt account to cover your identity. Keep in mind you are tagged because you are using an alt account that is trolling in the forum and not because you are standing up against them. You aren't even really standing up because you are just hiding in your alt account.
Is that so? Maybe some one should tell that to the 13 cult members excluding me because they don't like my criticism of their pals. I am sure the long list of people on the list no one has ever heard of are far more trustworthy. My crimes are too numerous to count after all.
I can't speak for the other 12 cult members but I excluded you after you
publically posted a PM between you and Hhampuz. I don't exclude people if I disagree with them or just because I think that they are assholes.
I see, so the fact that I posted that message is more of a problem than his duplicity and inability to have a conversation like an adult. Got it. You know what would have prevented that? Him willing to have a conversation about it, instead he chose to hide like a coward rather than explain himself. The message had nothing exceptional in it other than a demonstration of his duplicitous behavior, this is just a pathetic excuse for you to virtue signal to the DT mob. There is no presumption of privacy with personal messages. If this is your standard you should exclude
Suchmoon too. I am sure I could find plenty of other examples of people on your trust list that have shared PMs as well, but oh that's right you people only apply these standards to others when it serves your bias. This is just a woefully pathetic pretext for retaliation.