...I think that's the wrong approach. Posting for the "needs" of a campaign is wrong.
I have only asked if there are any special needs, is this wrong?
If actually, they would need more posts in any section which suites me, but I don't write there much because of the limited time we all have, it would be a great piece of information, not only for me but for many members who want to get a spot there.
I don't understand why my
question is such a big problem? Many signature campaigns literally ask members to post 10 or 20 posts/week in Gambling or somewhere else, how different is that?
Are they posting there because they like it? Of course not? Are they signature spammers? In my opinion, only if their posts are spam and any other reasons shouldn't be important for a moderator.
I can quote here multiple comments from members who are complaining that they have to write in some special sections only because of the signature, why nobody targets them?
In my opinion, because it is not what the moderator should focus on. Quality, on topic, forum rules, add to the discussion, etc., this is what makes post good or not, not the other motives whatever they are.
...Would you post the way you post if you didn't carry a signature and/or didn't want to apply for the Chipmixer campaign?...
Of course, I would and I have posted even more without any signature in the past.
I am posting a lot and sometimes I have to stop myself from posting even more, so really signature is for me only some extra money and why not to take it if I am here on the forum constantly every day.
You are also in the Chipmixer campaign, are you a worse poster because of that? Would you post differently if you would be not enrolled?