Re: The Objective Standards Guild - Testimonium Libertatem Iustitia
⭐ Merited by Vispilio (1)
lol, this will probably land me on one or two more shitlists. 
are those standards now set in stone? trust abuse and witch hunts are rampant, but do they have to be? maybe not. maybe TECSHARE is onto something.
he did. see "core tenets". the standards are very clear to me. ie no red tags based on opinions and unproven accusations + defend people from trust abuse in the face of unproven accusations.
i support the core tenets. i've seen countless people run off the forum by rampant trust abuse and petty reputation drama. it's getting old.
i can't give up my avatar or signature but i can put a short link in my personal message. something like "Objective Standards Guild: https://bit.ly/2P79Dxh"
Anyway, any community forms standards over time.
are those standards now set in stone? trust abuse and witch hunts are rampant, but do they have to be? maybe not. maybe TECSHARE is onto something.
I'm not exactly clear what you want to accomplish with those recommended inclusions/exclusions other than forming another set of standards which are anything but clear. In fact, I can't see into your brain so I don't know what they are. Maybe if you wrote them down?
he did. see "core tenets". the standards are very clear to me. ie no red tags based on opinions and unproven accusations + defend people from trust abuse in the face of unproven accusations.
i support the core tenets. i've seen countless people run off the forum by rampant trust abuse and petty reputation drama. it's getting old.
i can't give up my avatar or signature but i can put a short link in my personal message. something like "Objective Standards Guild: https://bit.ly/2P79Dxh"