Core tenets:
1. A standard of evidence of theft, violation of contractual agreement, or violation of applicable laws shall be documented in an objective and observable way before negative rating or flagging users.
2. Accusations without some form of documentation should be minimal.
3. Users who regularly and repeatedly ignore these standards should be excluded from trust lists.
4. Users who follow these standards should be included in trust lists.
5. Users who are subjected to accusations and ratings without any form of documentation should be defended and supported as much as possible.
I don't care to make this about me when it's so obviously all about you. But, do provide me with one instance, just one where I've tagged or flagged someone without providing evidence.
What I'm really trying to do here is provide "an objective and observable way" to prove your hypocrisy. You didn't add me to your exclusion list because of inappropriate tags or flags, you excluded me because I excluded you. It was retaliation. Prove me wrong?