SUGGESTED INCLUSIONS:
iCEBREAKER
You had me until here. The person who posts feedback like this:
Nudilah is a Dash shill who apologies for Evan's massive Instamine (see his buttkissing Trust entry) and spreads FAKE NEWS about competing projects (see Reference link).
Nudilah also viciously attacks the motivations of people questioning multi-year delay of Dash's previously announced i2p and Masternode Blinding features. A good example of red-tagging people for opinions. Not a good example of "standard of evidence of theft, violation of contractual agreement, or violation of applicable laws [...] documented in an objective and observable way".
I think that could certainly be seen as supporting knowingly a scam or trolling.
Doomad seems to be clearly saying this.
If he was a known bag holder of dash at the time and trying to dupe others into investing under knowingly deceptive false information that is scamming.
Just not sure why you latched onto that one considering the context red tags are currently used.
This is okay as a first step for sure but removal of tagging is the only long term fix because those acting sensibly with red tags now may not always do so once they feel fully entrenched.
I would add ~ to any member opposing the removal of tags and reliance upon The obective standards of the flagging system
perhaps 2 lists are best one of your own choosing and one submitted by more hardcore reformists that want to see a real long term move to flags and removal of tagging entirely.
Anyone that wants tagging retained should be ~
They have been given ample opportunity to present a case to defend against it being incredibly net negative and they have not been able to
therefore their obsession with retaining it is likely to leverage the subjectivity there for personal retribution and gain.
I would say that it can be useful to remove from DT some of the most abusive members but long term absolute removal of the potential to abuse rather than the current abusers.
Better to build a union of members that can ensure that fair and transparent standards are applied to all members equally.
for now ~ thepharmacist and loyceV those are merely spreading false information and deliberately fighting against those objective standards.
~ quicksellout7 should be removed as a matter of principle ( although he should be supporting this so he does not have to be controlled by lauda saving that red tag over pn7 forever , along with nulliusssssssss, jjg
I would give benefit of the doubt to a few others that seem to wish for a level playing field for all.
Not sure I would remove timelord at this time. I mean I have not heard his thoughts on moving to a more objective standard.
I think It will be tricky to get consensus for this but all members should wish to move to an objective set of standards. The only ones that do not can not even present a case for their views that stands up to scrutiny in the context being net positive for the forum.
I think to garner widespread support you would require consensus for the included excluded list. Best to focus on just forming a union of those that want an end to red tags and move to the flagging system.
Inclusions could be Royce , AMN, mikey, anyone that can be observed to want objective standards or who makes an effort to treat members equally
Personal squabbles should probably be out aside if they will support a foundation of objective standards as a base for the trust system.