SUGGESTED INCLUSIONS:
iCEBREAKER
You had me until here. The person who posts feedback like this:
Nudilah is a Dash shill who apologies for Evan's massive Instamine (see his buttkissing Trust entry) and spreads FAKE NEWS about competing projects (see Reference link).
Nudilah also viciously attacks the motivations of people questioning multi-year delay of Dash's previously announced i2p and Masternode Blinding features. A good example of red-tagging people for opinions. Not a good example of "standard of evidence of theft, violation of contractual agreement, or violation of applicable laws [...] documented in an objective and observable way".
LOL. This did immediately come to mind when I read the OP in this thread.
Pretty objectively certain this is why TS likes him:
If TECSHARE doesn't deserve Default Trust, almost nobody does.
I'd like to see what TECSHARE's trust rating is at default trust compared to what it will be when including and excluding those in his SUGGESTIONS.
And I would also like to know who gets to decide what counts as an "objective standard".