>Complains about harassment
>Aggressive and insulting in every post
>Complains about drama
>Opens a new topic every time he has a post deleted
>Wants an objective standard for inclusion on trust lists
>Includes anyone on DT1 if they include him back
Imma just leave this here
For ratings and type-1 flags, proactive scam-hunting is good!
Ah yes, more projection and another lame attempt at managing the narrative by an obvious alt. Not "harassment", trust system abuse. I want an objective standard for leaving negative ratings. I by far don't include anyone who includes me back, and of course this is the same refrain used when accusing me of "manipulating the trust system".
Any mutual inclusions I have are proof of malfeasance, and any mutual inclusions the ones accusing me of this have are justified, and they need not explain because it is their right to include who they like. If I include some one and they later include me I was "fishing for mutual inclusions". If some one adds me and I later add them I am "just adding anyone who includes me". This same nebulous standard can be applied to LITERALLY anyone on the default trust list, but of course when I make choices the clown car doesn't like, it is a crime that must be punished.
Like I said, manipulate deez.