at this point, a "scam buster" need only make an unproven or arbitrary accusation, point to the accusation in a trust page reference, and get a few of his buddies to agree---that's the standard for red trust now. proof of wrongdoing is never a requirement.
This has always been the case. You quoted and re-quoted the word "proactive" -- this means taking action
before people have actually been scammed. As such, you can't have "proof" of an event that hasn't yet happened.
Tags and Level 1 flags are good for this sort of thing. You and TS don't have to approve of it, but you are in the vast minority here.