Re: If we want a proper testing of Epochtalk, we need at least the Beta site back!
They recently changed the logic behind timezone offset (so each user can set their own GMT+/- local time) Tried it a few times but worked for me. Not sure what to say on that front. Could not replicate it
Set UTC (or some other timezone different from your actual timezone) in your account settings.
Again... works for me. Those temporary glitches are a real pain in the ass because if you cannot replicate you don't know what to fix. Regarding the last part just seesm the break point is not at the middle on the category button. A few more mm below and would have worked as advertised.
That's why this needs a proper vigilant QA person who can dig into this. I reckon I could figure out these "temporary glitches" in a couple of days but I don't have that much time.
Has some faults there. Tried to replicate your post here: https://coinbistro.com/threads/0ikKhHejRWmWWV3R8l6EgA/posts?start=40#8twUqUb-T9GSfGYUHyDGjw post #40 . Looks decent IMO altho had to edit the post a bit.
Did you have to remove newlines from my post? That's what I had to do to migrate some texts from Bitcointalk to Epochtalk and make them look somewhat similar. I find that unacceptable. I think it's a combination of "white-space: pre-wrap;" and "line-height: 1.5" that does this (typing from memory, apologies if I got it wrong).
Double-clicking the "Send Reply" [sic] button will duplicate posts (no warning).
Don't understand what button you're talking about...
Click "+ Post Reply" in a thread. Enter some text. Double-click "Send Reply" (it shouldn't be "Send" but that's another story). The post gets posted twice. Try the same on Bitcointalk.
Don't know about you but I found this to be very productive! Thank you so much for your input and for taking the time to install Epochtalk.
As I said before, any advice or critics is one more step towards the goal.
As I said before, any advice or critics is one more step towards the goal.
Again, I must respectfully disagree. See that quote that DdmrDdmr posted where I asked about documentation. If developers don't have requirements and if we just randomly poke at stuff to "test" it - that's not going to work. My day job used to be dealing with hopeless software projects. I know one when I see one.
I'd be very happy to be proven wrong in this particular instance though. Kim proved me wrong so it's doable.
