iCEBREAKER
What the hell is this?
Did you suggest users to include someone because of "your standards" and then you suggested them to not include them because
someone told you that this isn't "by your standards"?
Does it mean iCEBREAKER should be excluded or simply not included?
Besides, you fail at number 1:
Core tenets:
1. A standard of evidence of theft, violation of contractual agreement, or violation of applicable laws shall be documented in an objective and observable way before negative rating or flagging users.
1) you included account iCEBREAKER who abused trust and tagged someone without bringing any evidence of theft, contract violation...
1 a) as Icebreaker was/is in your trust network, there is no chance that you didn't notice that negative on nutildah's trust page therefore you don't care about anything you want others to care about, only thing you care about is your ass, that's why this threadI don't even want to read the rest of thread.
It just shows very poor judgement and this is what should be in topic of this thread:
~TECSHARE