I would be in complete agreement with this, but I don't think this is what TECSHARE is proposing. Without putting words in his mouth, he seems to be arguing for not tagging anyone until after a scam is committed
He is butthurt, that's why,
SUGGESTED INCLUSIONS:
BayAreaCoins
@TECSHARE are you going to remove
BayAreaCoins and suggest others to do it the same way you suggested other inclusions/exclusions:

Unless you are suggesting that
all forum members should follow "your standards" and whenever they tag someone who scammed someone, to write:
"scammer. This user reminds me of the user "TECSHARE". Just trowing that out there"

Are you suggesting that users should include BayAreaCoins because:
THIS IS MODERATION ISSUE! NOT TRUST ISSUE! TRUST ABUSE! This thread just beats all the crap you have been posting for the last
9 5 years!