Re: [ANN][TAO] Tao, AltMarket & FanMix - Real Solutions for the Music Industry!
"Falling off it's last exchange?" It's on three. You're so confused about everything. 
It is not his job to pump coins for your profits or pay listing fees to get on bigger volume exchanges.
You're just another confused crypto trader conditioned to see scams as legit, and legit projects as scams.
It is not his job to pump coins for your profits or pay listing fees to get on bigger volume exchanges. You're just another confused crypto trader conditioned to see scams as legit, and legit projects as scams.
I notice this is a method of diverting conversation frequently used by scammers and scam defenders: concentrate on one point that may be weaker than the others and ridicule the person making the points based on that one point. All my other points about Bryce being a serial scam artist remain true. The larger crypto community has accepted that he is a scammer since 2014 or 2015.
The trading volume for TAO is abysmal (next to nothing) on Altmarket. Whatever two other scammy far-flung exchanges its listed on that you have in mind, I'm sure the volume isn't significantly greater. According to Coinmarketcap, this coin died in December 2018:
https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/tao/
While CMC isn't the final judge of all things crypto, its certainly not a compelling sign that this coin is on the up-and-up.
I never touched this sack of shit, never would, so worrying about profits isn't my main motive here.
Jfc you're so boring. I've been over these talking points so many times. At least come up with some original material. Once again, you have it backwards. The other points were so weak I couldn't be bothered to quote them. Just because I can't be bothered to do a point by point refutation of basic claims I've gone over a thousand times with the various sock puppet troll accounts that have been tediously hassling me for years now, doesn't magically give your claims legitimacy.
Trade volume is not a relevant metric to determine the legitimacy of a project. Your bad trade decisions do not determine if something is a "scam." Not being listed on CMC is absolutely irrelevant for the same reasons. CMC decides whether to list based on trade volume.
What is it with people using that as some kind of relevant metric to determine legitimacy? Makes no sense.
I will once again ask, if Bryce is so clearly a scammer, why was he the first person from the crypto industry to court regulators and meet with both members of congress and also with the SEC? How does that make sense if he was up to something and had so many "scams" on public record?
His lobbying of congress got him an invite to a friendly meeting with the SEC, who clearly have no issue with anything he's doing.
I've mentioned all of this before but never get an answer as to how it makes sense in your mind that he's a serial scammer yet works with the approval of regulators.
Up is down, right is left, legitimate and legal behavior is scam in cryptoclownland. 😂
It is not his job to pump coins for your profits or pay listing fees to get on bigger volume exchanges.
This is the actual reason why your coin never made it to any real exchanges:
I think alpha nodes are deliberately not turned on yet? I think I read that somewhere, maybe on the slack.
Yes they have never been enabled. The info is on here and has been said on the slack.
So much for "you are all part of the network".
I know a shitcoin when I see one, and this is one. Do yourself a favor Bryce Weiner, do not get music-companies involved with TAO, they will sue you for every penny you got after they realize you only delivering shit slow shitcoins which don't even trade on real exchanges.
I did take a round to speak with exchange-operators to see if there was anything I could do to get listing, but apparently Bryce Weiner, you have threatened people so badly in the past, that frankly unless you sincerely apologize to them in person, they will never do business with you again ever. And since you are too proud to admit any mistakes, I assume this project will just be another "PandaCoin".
My suggestion - Set up an ICO BuyBack wall and buy it all back, call it a non-profit that failed, Kill the Chain and let us all move on with projects that are more serious and capable then this project will ever be.
Peter, you reported Bryce to the SEC--something I suggested since you're so confident he's a sCaMmEr. Anything come of that? 🤔
Just like Presdurrwhatsisname, you're illogically using trade volume as a metric to asses whether an exchange is "real." Typical limited crypto mindset. Given the way the troll accounts always seem to appear in rotation and parrot the same talking points, I often wonder if you're all one person. Definitely fewer than it is made to look like.
Funny that you quote some random old conversation you dredged up from two and a half years ago that mentions masternodes and for some reason criticizes the speed of the network. Meanwhile, 2.5 years later it's still working smoothly and without technical issues.
Not the fastest confirmation times compared to some cryptos, sure, but faster blocktimes than Bitcoin which is still widely regarded as the definitive cryptocurrency.
Masternodes are coming in the next few weeks--I've been saying they'd be activated in 2020 since last year, BTW-- as part of the new Ethereum-forked codebase. And, if speed is a concern, the new codebase will feature 2 second block times.
The rest of what you quoted was some guy claiming he talked to some other guy who wants Bryce to apologize to him or something. Hearsay quoting hearsay, but even if true, who cares?
You're still getting mired down in this silly notion that a project is legitimized somehow by trade volume. Shallow thinking, if you excuse the pun.
Speaking of the Tao 2.0 relaunch, here's a new roadmap that was posted today for those people interested in actually learning what's going on instead of time wasting rehashing years-old tedium
https://medium.com/@BryceWeiner/the-tao-2020-roadmap-part-one-4bfef68e161
