Re: The Objective Standards Guild - Testimonium Libertatem Iustitia
A small erratum is needed here.
I don't know if this thread was a response to the gang thread, but I can say for sure that the gang thread was not created as a response to Timelord's ridiculous allegations, with no substance / proof,towards this profile against press. Nor it was determined by the comments regarding growing a thicker skin.
Seriously, it wasn't. I had the idea for this topic for a while ago and it sounded funny
That's why I said to be counted as a pamphlet. Besides, I also stated that I was determined to write it after seeing all xtraelv's historic topics. Never thought though it would trigger such reactions, as Timelord's (including his deleted posts, in case you saw them).
Xtraelv also mentioned multiple scandals in his topic related to historic forum battles, but his topic disn't generate such reactions, although it was a serious topic. Mine was a pamphlet and I wrote it when I was in a mood for fun. But I had it in mind for since some time ago and I just waited the moment when I felt also in the mood for writing something funny. Apparently, nobody felt disturbed excepting Timelord, although I used expression as "the clowns cartel", "controlling merit / trust system" etc. People understood humour -- and I'm glad -- excepting him.
I also mentioned this guild in the nascent gangs section, but, apparently, TECSHARE understood the humour and he didn't come with replies against my topic.
What I want to say is that the respective topic was made when I felt I'm in the mood for fun, not as a response to Timelord's delusion. Regarding him and his feedback on me, I think it's clear that the guy "speaks another language", to say so
Regarding "Argue against them, grow thicker skin, ignore them, but no one should be trying to silence them by using red trust as a weapon.", I fully agree with that.
.
This thread was initially created in response to the "gang" thread, which was initially created because of comments regarding people growing thicker skin. No one should be trying to police what other people say. You disagree? Fine. You are offended? Also fine. Argue against them, grow thicker skin, ignore them, but no one should be trying to silence them by using red trust as a weapon.
This thread was initially created in response to the "gang" thread, which was initially created because of comments regarding people growing thicker skin. No one should be trying to police what other people say. You disagree? Fine. You are offended? Also fine. Argue against them, grow thicker skin, ignore them, but no one should be trying to silence them by using red trust as a weapon.
I don't know if this thread was a response to the gang thread, but I can say for sure that the gang thread was not created as a response to Timelord's ridiculous allegations, with no substance / proof,
Seriously, it wasn't. I had the idea for this topic for a while ago and it sounded funny
That's why I said to be counted as a pamphlet. Besides, I also stated that I was determined to write it after seeing all xtraelv's historic topics. Never thought though it would trigger such reactions, as Timelord's (including his deleted posts, in case you saw them).Xtraelv also mentioned multiple scandals in his topic related to historic forum battles, but his topic disn't generate such reactions, although it was a serious topic. Mine was a pamphlet and I wrote it when I was in a mood for fun. But I had it in mind for since some time ago and I just waited the moment when I felt also in the mood for writing something funny. Apparently, nobody felt disturbed excepting Timelord, although I used expression as "the clowns cartel", "controlling merit / trust system" etc. People understood humour -- and I'm glad -- excepting him.
I also mentioned this guild in the nascent gangs section, but, apparently, TECSHARE understood the humour and he didn't come with replies against my topic.
What I want to say is that the respective topic was made when I felt I'm in the mood for fun, not as a response to Timelord's delusion. Regarding him and his feedback on me, I think it's clear that the guy "speaks another language", to say so
Regarding "Argue against them, grow thicker skin, ignore them, but no one should be trying to silence them by using red trust as a weapon.", I fully agree with that.