Re: The Objective Standards Guild - Testimonium Libertatem Iustitia
Well, he removed that member that suchmoon raised concerns over right? so he is demonstrating he is working hard to take in all relevant feedback.
Working hard? Please.One swallow doesn't make a summer. What he showed in this thread is that he is hypocrite, that's it. Ranting in reputation because someone tagged him, at the same time having account who also placed "troll" -ve rating in his trust network, at the same time suggesting others to include this account, at the same time some users calling this "cherry picked"
He agrees this is good feedback but he doesn't agree this is good feedback
Suggesting objective standards and at the same time can't provide proof to back up his words in trust feedback!
I have read your post 3x. Although I'm hitting the scotch early this evening, I am certain that even sober I would struggle to gain from it that which you wish to convey. That is not meant as an insult. Just so you know.
Please consider all of my previous replies to you in this thread and do your very best to understand that the lists are of small consequence after transparent objective standards are set in place. Also if a person with frivolous tagging habits States they will reform to abide by transparent objective standards, then I say l let their actions speak for them going forward, for the good of the entire forum. Include them and observe carefully. Never be afraid to do that Which you think is correct. The transparent objective standards will protect you, if you deserve protection.
It is inevitable the guild will eventually succeed. Everyone wishes to be treated fairly when they realize the spots with advantage are saturated.