why are you directing this at me?
You said trust abuse is "cherrypicked example", I don't see how is that attacking you, it seems you are trying to attack users and when they respond you act like you are a victim.
I suspect the answer is less than the excludes, although as I said tecshare is likely too complex to be binary. The answer you must accept, could be beyond your capacity to fully understand and appreciate. That's why it' is only a suggestion.
Ok, got it, you suspect answer is "according to objective standards of this guild, it is just fine to create abusive tags (
abusive by standards of guild)".
For such a vocal trust abuse fighter you're incredibly dense when it comes to the actual use (and abuse) of the trust system. So you didn't review the people you added to your trust list? How did you pick them? Based on nice words they said?
They picked them based on principles of this Guild, of course

i agree with the stated principles of the Objective Standards Guild. i already strived to work towards them in my own feedback and trust list before this thread existed.
...you remember those principles, right? "Evidence of theft, violation of contracts, violation of applicable laws"...
This guild is just brilliant, and getting better by the day.
Maybe OP is trying to say that according to him anyone who left tag before scam happened is trust abuser(of course, everyone except him and some of his trust fwiends)? That would make sense.