Re: The Objective Standards Guild - Testimonium Libertatem Iustitia
of course i did, but there's like 40 inclusions on my trust list added over a long period of time. i can't recall every single feedback or the circumstances surrounding them. it would make things a lot simpler if you would simply state your claim ("user X is on your trust list and is engaging in trust abuse"). that's what an honest person would do.
Oh so now it's my fault?
Maybe spend less time talking about the trust system abuse and more time doing something about it. Just a suggestion, not intended as ad hominem.
if you want to point out a case of trust abuse, i'm happy to review it, and perhaps adjust my trust list accordingly if it's warranted. instead, you're just asserting falsities about my actions and piling on ad hominems.
i agree with the stated principles of the Objective Standards Guild. i already strived to work towards them in my own feedback and trust list before this thread existed.
Just start from the top of your trust list and do what you were supposed to do and claimed to have done. Lying is not cool. Just an observation, not intended as ad hominem.
i didn't suggest that. i'm trying to flesh out a complex issue and i'm asking for guidance about it from people in this thread, given the stated goals in the OP and the current power dynamics in the trust system. you are clearly putting words in my mouth and misrepresenting my position. you're also ignoring these points in the OP, which i agree with, and which leave room for some level of grey area---not nearly as much grey area as the current system, but some nonetheless:
It's not complex. Don't retaliate with red trust and there won't be any gray areas. Problem solved, now you have more free time to review your trust list. Just an advice, not intended as ad hominem.
~ screeching snowflake stuff ~
Oh FFS... get over yourself. I couldn't care less if your feewings got hurt and I reserve the right to respond that way to anyone who weasels out of substantiating their ridiculous claims. This was intended as ad hominem.