I remain unconvinced of the flat earth "buoyancy" theory of gravity because of the inconsistencies and contradictions, and because of the inability of proponents to explain it. I wonder if this one would be more suitable: Le Sage's theory of gravitation
||
"Space and time", "planets", "galaxies" and "gravity"? In other words fucking nonsense!
The Coulomb force (electromagnetism) ultimately drives any material particles in motion. "Space and time" along with relativistic "gravity" is a concept from Relativity (1905) and was falsified by D&P Sagnac (1939) at the University of Paris. What was proven, is that there is a static aether.
The concept of "planets" as giant heavenly spheres reflecting sunlight over a distances of up to six billion miles and, the idea that the Earth is one of those balls of shit is batshit insanity! "galaxies" trillions upon trillions miles away? Go back to sleep man!
The small lights you see moving in the sky are, #1 just small lights (not giant balls of shit) and, #2 are actually moving. To claim the stars are stationary and it's you that that's moving is nonsense, like the legs of your horse moving the ground below them.
Le Sage's theory goes in the same basket as BADecker, who is permanently cucked on the heavenly spheres! If your answer to anything about the earth or the heavens involves ideas, concepts and theories from the satanic priests and their giant balls of shit then, you also go into that basket!
These satanic priests are part of a cabal created by the Kabbalists. Einstein was both a Jew and a Jesuit!