do 2 ratings from 5 years ago imply that he is regularly ignoring the standards? serious question.
You claim to be complying with the "standard" so maybe you should tell us what the criteria for "regularly" is. So far you seem to be waiting for someone else to give you examples of bullshit in your trust list so that you could come up with suitable thresholds to excuse it.
As I've already asked earlier in the thread, does
a trust rating from February 17, 2020 still count or did the statute of limitations run out on that too?
you keep straw manning my position to be completely inflexible and black-and-white. i've shown that it's anything but.
i said i agree with the stated principles of the Objective Standards Guild and that i strive to work towards them. those principles, as stated above, say that accusations without documentation should be minimal (=/= non-existent), and that regular offenders should be excluded.
It's nice to have some vague words like "minimal" and "regular" in your "standard", isn't it?
so you can hold me to completely faultless/impeccable standards re trust inclusions (which i actually never agreed to---see above), but you don't care in the slightest about trust abuse in your own inclusions?
Talk about straw people. Don't care in the slightest? I don't go around creating vanity threads to boast about whatever criteria I use for my trust lists, I just do it. And no, I don't comply with TECSHARE's standards and I consider them utterly ridiculous, designed to stroke his ego and to give excuses to weasels like you.