Minimum 35 posts per week? Isnt that too much and it will influence the quality? Also they payment amount is not as high as in other campaign (but this is not my business).
Last question - who is holding the funds? Escrow? Im asking that because that influenced a lot on bestchange signature campaign. They didnt use escrow and BM got a negative trust for a period of time... as well as some people abandoned the campaign because of that.
I agree 35 posts is too much compared to the reward. I hope the campaign manager changes his mind to reduce the minimum post or increase the reward per week.
I also agree with you that there will be changes in this campaign.
Given that a minimum of 35 posts per week is too much.
Maybe they can make it 20-25 post minimum so it may look understandable to users participate in the campaign.
I dont think they need to increase the rewards, its another story. as long ascthey reduce the post needed its fine.