You seem to be straying from any logical argument now and just projecting at this point.
1) User doesn't like the tags they have been given by other users
2) User proposes changes to the way tags are handed out
3) User benefits if/when they are no longer tagged in a manner they don't approve of
Seems to follow logically to me. Are you saying that doesn't sound self-serving?
1) I hit you in the face for no reason.
2) You propose I stop hitting you in the face.
3) You benefit from not being hit in the face.
Is your proposal self serving? I would say so. Is that wrong or dishonest?
If I proposed you stop hitting me in the face via the guise of a forum post proposing best practice for hitting people in the face objectively and providing a list of users I thought might be well-suited to judging when it's correct to hit people in the face, rather than simply just coming out and saying it? Kinda, yeah.