Scambusters are the A.I.D.S. of the Bitcointalk world.
SUGGESTED INCLUSIONS:
hacker1001101001
But, the extent of such abuse is to were you are referring to the good deeds of there scam busting, but on other hands, they don't even think twice to tear apart the repo of another scam buster like me. One can surely see these goods deeds really doesn't outweigh the damage caused on another side.
I am so confused, did you just suggest everyone to include
"A.I.D.S. of the Bitcointalk world" to their trust lists

Now this is very interesting,
seems account
poochpocket is tagged as an alt of hacker:

I would usually ask for proofs, but according to OP and some of his suggested trust inclusions and mutual agreement that it is ok to have such tag as long as
"it depends" and/or "
is lower than some number" or "
it's ok", I guess it is "
it's ok" then.