Fraud Warning
Well.. the predicted panic cycle this week in the stock market seems pretty much on time.. 
Aaand... predicted temp high in gold yesterday... This is like stealing candy from a baby haha.
How is your trading going?
Aaand... predicted temp high in gold yesterday... This is like stealing candy from a baby haha.
How is your trading going?
Well if you are predicting a Panic Cycle Every other week and it happens only once every 3 months then what does that mean?
Nothing.
Well so far at least the opening of this week based on FUTURES looks like DOWN HARD to me. So I have to tip my hat off to armstrong for this week, it looks like he is going to be right about this panic cycle week. Need to give credit where credit is due, not many traders can say ahead of time or weeks ahead of time when a panic cycle WEEK is going to occur.
That Predicted Panic Cycle became an inside session as we know:
No Panic Cycle week. Armstrong's call was (another) failure. According to the site, a Panic Cycle is defined as an outside reversal to penetrate the previous session high or low. This week was an inside session; the Dow did not at any point exceed last week's high or low.
Not only that (the S&P was down a lousy 1% on the week):
So you are once again denied the option to use this forum for fraudulent advertising.
I think that over45, m96, Alex-11 need a reminder.
As previously said, Gumbi's and cohorts' posts get replied to in a way that will remind them of the context in which we showed them that Martin Armstrong is a charlatan.
Let him be reminded again that we have a model case where this behavior is documented in much detail. Here we show how Martin Armstrong's fraud manifests itself. Beyond any doubt. A self-documenting case. It actually saves time and effort to repeat this as opposed to wasting the time trying to argue this same type of thing without end.
Whatever smokescreen over45, Gumbi, m96, Alex-11 and cohorts are coming up with now, they get this reply. I know they just want this message to go away but I am not going to do Martin Armstrong the favor. I am just not taking his baits for more nonsense any more.
The pattern is the same again and again: Pick one of the ambiguous conflicting Socrates signals in hindsight to argue the case. For us, there is no need to formulate a custom response to that. We use this standard response that documents the following model case. To show everyone what these charlatans are doing.
I have an obligation to spread the message for the honest people, and as painful as it is for me, I am going to persevere until the Armstrong promoters shut up. So they are warned. The honest people have all the facts on their side.
AnonymousCoder"Quarterly reversal time unit is one quarter. Gold rallied before the quarter was over and no other signal in the opposite direction was available to indicate change of direction.
The time span is 1 to 3 units in time so the quarterly bearish reversal had 1 to 3 quarters before time was up.
Armstrong wrote on his private blog on the first of March our quarterly level of the model generated a bullish reversal at the end of the year reversing its short position and going long. This also signaled that gold would rally from the $1060 area and should test the next bullish reversal at the $1347 level."
Not sure if you are aware or not but you are losing this discussion.
The time span is 1 to 3 units in time so the quarterly bearish reversal had 1 to 3 quarters before time was up.
Armstrong wrote on his private blog on the first of March our quarterly level of the model generated a bullish reversal at the end of the year reversing its short position and going long. This also signaled that gold would rally from the $1060 area and should test the next bullish reversal at the $1347 level."
Not sure if you are aware or not but you are losing this discussion.
Here we go. You are providing the proof of my assertion yourself!
Hindsight, Fraud. This hindsight message is fraudulent misrepresentation of performance, pure fraud!
Now here you are saying, and I know you are speaking for Martin Armstrong, that
Martin Armstrong had this information, this bullish signal, the fact that his model went long - at the end of the year - but at the same time failed to tell his clients?
In fact he sent the opposite signal to his clients at the time!
If he knew this at the time when he claimed the system went long, and let's assume for the sake of argument that what you say is true then he could have been trading against his clients because he published this signal only three months later.
You are not worth the respect of a single honest being on earth! You are a fraud!
And yes, I have all the reports. How could I otherwise quote them? I have everything!
More importantly, all other people who lost, they have everything as well.
Here is a detailed time line of the events:
Quarterly Superposition Event in Gold 2015
Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.
Read this blog starting at page 273 to find out more about computerized fraud.
See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.