Can't you kids learn how to play nice? Getting a little ridiculous with all these blah blah is a trust abuser threads. Just ~ him and move on.
BTW who cares about the guild bs too, it's just someone(TECHSHARE) trying to start an actual gang. Nothing objective about it. Just a totally biased group hoping to take over IMO.
Take over what? This giant pile of shit you call the trust system? Now because I offer any resistance whatsoever to this abuse by exercising my right to have a voice in the system I am trying to "take over"? All I am doing is advocating for supporting people who I think use the trust system properly. Everyone else is free to form their own little cliques and abuse people who criticize them. Of course any time I include, exclude, criticize, or organize people within it it is automatically evidence of abuse of some kind.
Can't you kids learn how to play nice? Getting a little ridiculous with all these blah blah is a trust abuser threads. Just ~ him and move on.
BTW who cares about the guild bs too, it's just someone(TECHSHARE) trying to start an actual gang. Nothing objective about it. Just a totally biased group hoping to take over IMO.
I don't think that can be true. Since the important aspect of the guild is not the specific members, only that they abide with transparent objective standards that provide the optimal environment here that can currently be devised.
JollyGood is a prime example of the urgent need to prevent red tags bring used to crush free speech.
Really? This right here makes it a biased group. Why you think he listed these names? For fun?
Who is free of bias? You? Anyone who claims to be free of bias is lying. You are free to maintain your own bias just as I am, even if that were the case that the list is bias. This list is nothing more than a number of users who I feel either use the trust system appropriately, or abuse it. What you want from me is submission and silence in the face of abuse, not lack of bias.