Re: #1021758 “hacker1001101001” = #304376 “poochpocket” = rude, uncouth ingrate
⭐ Merited by Lauda (1)
@hacker is this bought account?
Good question.
Getting excluded over a flag in refusal to DOXX somebody while keeping the flag to protect the public. I stated it because I do not want to do it not to this guy, not to TECSHARE, CH or whoever next is mounting stupid attacks against me.
Now, two aphorisms come to mind:
- No good deed goes unpunished.
- Damned if you do, damned if you dont.
Doxing over something this trivial is unnecessary.
The logical cases of suchmoon:
- Damned if you do... Lauda hypothetically drops dox: Doxing over something this trivial is unnecessary.
- ...damned if you dont. Lauda actually acts in good faith to try to avoid dropping dox, even if it is justified due to being evidence (which you say must be publicly disclosed) to support a flag: She is flagging without evidence, and threatening people.
You being (potentially) doxed doesn't make it right either.
Red herring. Nobody can actually dox Lauda, except maybe the NSA (who may or may not be able to dox anybody).
Her hypothetical statement clearly illustrated the hypocrisy of people who object to her actions of avoiding disclosure of hackers dox, whereas the rabble would cheer if she were to be doxed. Anything else you read into it is just that.
Even if the reactions are not "uniform", it still doesn't make it right. For example despite Quickseller's (speaking of puppet masters) repeated attempts to dox me I wouldn't dox him unless there is an actual reason.
More red herrings.
Lauda even after my multiple apologies to her
It does not work like that. [...] This is not remorse, this is not being sorry, this is worse - active deception under pretenses of being remorseful.What I call apology culture does have the effect of encouraging insincere apologies as the basis for peremptory demands of being allowed to get away with anything.
~
you still licking the pussy after such an shameful act by Lauda
~
Yes, one can't lick it better than your adviced approach.
The principal purpose of the fence is to keep you out:
The actual fence is much higher,
and it works both ways.
That is a statute of the most famous ancient Greek ἑταίρᾱν, the cultural equivalent of a classical gaṇikā. (I will be pleased if anybody can correct my inconsistent declensions here.)
But it is irrelevant to Lauda.
Whilst travelling on business in Carpathia,
I doxed Lauda:
.jpg/590px-Carpathian_Lynx_7_(13366120813).jpg)
I doxed Lauda:
P.S.,
Complaints > /dev/null