When I read your post, I remember that I write something similar few days ago in this post on topic "Having secondary/multiple accounts purpose is..?". We seem to share a similar opinion about some moral and ethical principles, but they are hardly applicable in the real world, let alone in the virtual world. I believe there are people who have several accounts active in various sig campaigns, but this is allowed by the forum rules.
This is one example where the community is failing. For certain things we draw to "it is allowed by the rules, but we do not condone the behavior (thus act on it)", on others we draw to "it is allowed by the rules, but we do not condone the behavior yet we will ignore it (and thus not act on it)". If it is ethnically and morally wrong, which it is, the community needs to draw to consensus and start dealing with it. This would be very simple. Group together whole DT 1, get majority to agree what is right and what is wrong behavior regarding multi-accounting and the issues is solved.
This is not happening because the very same members (some are - not all obviously) are involved in this business, either by multi-accounting, by enabling multi-accounters as proxies, by managing the campaigns or by doing both and more. There is no other good reason for this that I can think of. Quite unfortunate..
