Nutilduhh was trying to cast my exclusion of you as retaliatory, but they didn't realize I was the first to exclude you, then you excluded me very shortly after.
No, that's not what I said. You are trying to shoehorn my words into a point you deem favorable to yourself (which is not really, anyway). Besides, pre-emptively excluding 2 users out 21 who excluded you doesn't seem like something to brag about.
This whole thing is a laughable exercise proving just how self-centered and non-objective your judgment actually is. You basically feel that if someone disagrees with you, they must be wrong, which is something I've known about you for quite some time.
Have fun developing your anti-gang. Don't count on recruitment to pick up until you can figure out a way to stop being objectively full of shit, though.
Yes Nuttillduuh, you certainly don't have your own history of suspect activity and making baseless accusations against me. I am sure you weren't suggesting I excluded him for retaliatory reasons at all.
"Pre-emptively" interesting choice of words... that implies he was going to exclude me... and that I did it before he could do it to me first, as opposed to simply not agreeing with his use of the trust system. You were just saying something about not accusing me of excluding him in retaliation?
"You basically feel that if someone disagrees with you, they must be wrong, which is something I've known about you for quite some time. "
A lot to unpack in that statement.
-I disagree with you
-You think I must be wrong
-You have been assured of your conclusion for a long time
No projection here.
All I am advocating for is a standard of evidence of theft, contractual violation, or violation of applicable laws before leaving negative ratings. The coordinated attacks on me via the trust system for doing nothing more than advocating for this demonstrates why this change is needed very clearly.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213992.msg53936512#msg53936512https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5210651.0https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=915823.msg53925898#msg53925898https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5221450.0;allResolved:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5225907.0What has changed all of a sudden that all of these users known for their abuse of the trust system feel the need to tag me in a very short period of time? Right, me being vocal about their abuse of the trust system. How exactly is this system supposed to operate if criticism of abuse is allowed to be met with more abuse? It won't, and it will eventually become a tool for con artists to suppress reporting of their crimes, if it isn't already.