Actually the response was incomplete and ambiguous. "No" as in I refuse to answer? No as in your rating is not valid? No as in his rating is not valid? That was not an answer. There is no "gotcha" games, simply asking Suchmoon to clearly define their position, and pointing out that they are in fact supporting a trust system abuser based on their own words.
Only a fool or someone incredibly dishonest would not consider "no" to be an answer to a "yes" or "no" question. So which one are you? Because you are definitely one or the other, if not both.
I know you have trouble with reading comprehension, but my explanation above is very self explanatory why the answer was ambiguous.
Because it is a testament to your intellectual dishonesty and generally inability to be honest, let's review what you just said. First of all, these were the questions being posed:
Is the rating I left for Vod valid or not? Are the ratings he left for me valid or not?
No and no.
Your claim is that these may be answers to _another question_ that existed only in your own head, and not the ones you specifically asked. You asked two "yes" or "no" questions, you received 2 "no" answers. To perceive these as being answers to any other question than the ones you specifically asked is simply illogical.
Whether you have a severe impairment in logic or are acting out of dishonesty is up for debate, though I tend to lean toward believing the latter in this instance.