You know, you hit the spot here: Some even make the mistake of speaking against gambling while they are carrying a gambling signature.
You can't pretend you like gambling just because you're wearing a gambling signature. Unless it is stated in the campaign thread, I guess we're allowed to speak freely about it.
It`s a subject for another thread, but I don`t know if people will be totally honest to answer if they believe in the service they are promoting
~
More than 50% of the things people promote are likely not something they personally like or use. If ChipMixer had accepted you in their sig campaign, I'm more than sure you'd accept it even if you do not use/support their service. The amount of BTC you're going to earn will trigger a positive answer to their offer. It's a psychological thing we do as humans.
I don't agree with some points, you have to participate on a campaign only for a service that you aproves
If the service you're wearing do something wrong you can feel guilty to help promote, just an example
I think here in forum we have a recent problem about users get negative trust for wearing a bad signature campaign
But I have the sense of we are just helping promote a service, we are not totally responsible for the services they promote, but we can select our signatures in a better way