There is no evidence. You said it yourself, it is an assumption. These accusations claim to know not only my thoughts, intents, but claim to know who I have and have not communicated with. Furthermore, the cooperation I received from these users when they responded positively to suggestions to remove support for invalid flags led me to conclude they would be positive additions to the trust system.
Again, you are manufacturing a false timeline. We've been over this before. You were adding (and removing) these users
months before the whole Timelord fake flag bonanza. This is the 3rd time I am bringing it up in this thread, let's see if you ignore it yet again:
You also never addressed this post where I correct your mistaken timeline of events regarding your involvement with the Turkish community:
That said, if you review the original
thread Vod bases his accusation on, you will see I made an effort to mutually resolve a conflict between members of the Turkish community and Timelord. This lead to several interactions with several of the members of the Turkish community, of which I gained respect for because of how they handled the response. I must assume they felt the same way and this is why they added me. I didn't do anything I wasn't supposed to and these accusations are nothing but a tall tale designed to make sure I wasn't allowed to be put back on the default trust instigated by people with very long time, publicly documented animus against me.
Your timeline is off. The trust trading was happening well before your involvement with Timelord's fake flag bonanza.
The post you linked is dated September 7th, and you were playing trust games with Russian and Turkish local board posters from July through August. The only reason these users were on your radar was because they had recently been promoted to DT1, and like you, were either off or barely hanging on by 1-2 votes. Your other great rationale for adding local board posters is because somebody like Foxpup, suchmoon or myself distrust them, which according to you, "makes them interesting." Still a terrible reason to include someone in your trust list, and evidence you don't belong on DT.
Seems like you wouldn't have to lie about this if you had actual interactions with these members before September.
I am not manufacturing anything. Your continual accusations are based on nothing. I was adding and removing users. Case closed! Again, this is proof of nothing other than the fact I was using the trust system like everyone else has a right to, unless of course you and the clown car disagree with those inclusions, then I am "manipulating" the trust. According to you, if I add some one, I am fishing for reciprocal inclusions, if I remove some one it was because I didn't get an inclusion or for retaliation, if some one adds me and I add them later, I only added them because they added me.
This is completely arbitrary and could be an accusation made against LITERALLY anyone actively using custom trust lists. These accusations also assume to know what my internal motivation and though process is. This is simply is a round about way for you and your red nosed friends to be able to dictate to me who is on my trust list. If you want to exclude me for this, go right ahead. Using negative ratings for this is not a valid use of the rating system. Your accusations are baseless and designed to retaliate outside the rules of the system because you don't think I should get to have any say in the system and I refuse to cave to the dictates of you and your pals and make choices based on what I think is right. This is about preventing me from using the system, not preventing manipulation of it. More people on the default trust makes it harder for your small group of friends to maintain control of it. You all know this, which is why that specific group of users who wants to maintain that unilateral power are working overtime to attack, slander, and abuse the trust system against me for doing nothing more than exercising my vote.