Dear lawyer please can you switch accounts and talk directly as lauda? Its getting confusing with you talking because you want to show like Lauda is busy or away.
I think the immediate accusatory remarks show signs of paranoia. It's understandable to feel indignant and trapped by the partisan trust system but I think it's also important to note that just because someone disagrees with you, they are not immediately attributable to the side you're directly opposing.
If you are not Lauda then please stay away, I want input from neutral people not paid puppets/shills who feel like they are friends with Lauda and now they can conquer the world.
Am I immediately considered non-neutral simply because I appear to be defending Lauda? In that case, would your definition of neutrality be "unfavorable towards Lauda"?
In reality they live in their own fantasy, we all know why Lauda settled with QS because QS was coming up with more and more facts against Lauda and it was soon he would be busted.
I wouldn't use the word
know since the only way for you to really
know is if you yourself were Lauda.
(addendum edited since you revised your post)
hey i had a thought, have you ever opposed Lauda ever on forum? So you feel like he is God?
I have opposed Lauda, yes. There are a number of cases in which I've literally countered a rating from Lauda. Other forum members of which I've directly opposed include Vod, OgNasty, TECSHARE, etc... the list goes on.
EDIT: (in relation to subsequent post)
respect for the good replies, actually felt I crossed the line after you replied. But why do you promote a bad service for a few cents man?
Responded via PM.