I think the community can thank “Morbidus” for the repeated confirmation of his lack of understanding! As a summary of a meanwhile never ending thread: I pointed it out as quint-essence in my in initial posting here, that it is impossible to lead a thorough discussion about a specific crypto project in a group with nearly 10 000 members, where a coherent discussion thread is only possible with the citation of the previous snippet of the conversation, always interrupted through several other discussion fragments. The discussions in groups over 1000 members have a half-life period of just a few minutes, afterwards the thread is getting a useless data garbage. Everyone knows this and nobody will disagree. When I wanted logically to link to an outsourced non-profit discussion group, the moderators of CMC claimed the territorial sovereignty of discussion and said: “No, you have to discuss here, and you are not allowed to link to your own discussion!” How ridiculous! And as if this wouldn’t have been enough, the querulous chat moderator began to troll me, indeed quite like a little child, after just four private messages and a friendly bye, with "I am right and you are wrong". A “dear colleague, you have your opinion, I have my opinion, that's ok!” he couldn’t accept. Although the deleted link to my channel was just the trigger, but not the issue of this thread (what of course this moderator never will get), I asked the creator of the CoinGecko Group for his opinion.