What you did was a felony Vod, and also something other users get a permanent instaban for doing just what you did. Still waiting for you to quote any substantiation for any of the claims you have made in your negative ratings against me. This thread is replete with examples of you abusing the trust system against me in the past in an attempt to extort me into silencing my criticisms of your behavior. This time is no different, it is just an extension of your years of obsession with me.
*snip*
But since I admittedly can't prove that I know what you were actually thinking or what your actual motivations were *snip*
Finally a bit of direct honest analysis from someone else......
As an outsider... its maddening to see how this is progressing.
Don't be maddened. It's impossible to
prove pretty much anything if you're looking at it in absolute terms (which TECSHARE does on a regular basis when it's to his benefit).
Nearly every scam that's ever happened on this forum lacks the evidence to prove that there is a 0.0% chance that the scammer is innocent.
Same goes for pretty much every crime that involves the internet or computers.
The same goes for every criminal who was convicted based on finger prints or DNA.
Don't fall for the 'circumstantial evidence is worthless. nothing more than baseless speculation'. Circumstantial evidence is pretty much all we have for anything on a forum like this. If we decided to just ignore it, scammers would be able to get away with anything.
If you're just looking for 100% proof of anything in these situations, you'll never find it. The best you can do is look at the evidence, consciously be as objective as possible and make up your own mind. Most likely some will disagree with your opinion. That's not a bad thing.
Absolute horse shit. You have ZERO evidence, not even circumstantial. Everything presented relies on assumptions and pretending to know what my state of mind was. That coming from a group of people with clearly documented bias and plenty of past history of antagonism against me is nothing but worthless fodder to serve petty vendettas.
Furthermore there is plenty of motivation for the people who gate keep the default trust to try to discredit me, because what I am advocating for disables their ability to unilaterally control the trust system, punish their critics free of repercussions, and protect them from being penalized with in it for their own illicit activities by offering mutual protection as a small uniform voting block.
If we are talking about circumstantial evidence, I have FAR MORE evidence that the trust system is being abuse against me to serve personal vendettas and protection of control of the trust system than you do that I was ever abusing it in any way. Almost without exception, everyone who currently has left me negative ratings has a history of using them abusively and being forced to remove them in the past because the community judged them to be baseless. That is more solid than your stacks of assumptions and claims to have the ability to read my mind.
Again, what this boils down to is people shouldn't be tagging based on opinions or disagreeing with opinions, which is exactly what all this is. These kind of ratings are totally indistinguishable from trust system abuse, which is exactly the point of doing it under such pretenses, so you can maintain a plausible denial that this is abuse, while never presenting any actual evidence.