Re: Chipmixer sponsor dangerous untrustworthy members and Racists and unfair treat?
I think chipmixer owner should come .I will ask him why such a large proportion of chipmixer advertisers are sponsored that also trust abuse other members and why most are from same pool of people that share merit and trust inclusions.
I will ask him to see the highest quality posters and most trustworthy members then show me.
The reason they appointed a campaign manager is to take care of these activities and he is doing a good job and they are satisfied with the way the campaign is run and the selection process is always the campaign managers discretion and there is no point in crying about that.I will ask him to see the highest quality posters and most trustworthy members then show me.
Suppose you are the campaign manager of Chipmixer i would like to see your list of high quality posters in your opinion and then i will respond to your nepotism and racist bias claims in a forum where everyone is known as alias behind a laptop
. I am seeing these kind of threads quite often and it is quite funny and cringe worthy to be frank and wanted to know your real story behind these claims 
.If they are satisfied with him hiring proven racist dishonest cheaters and trust abusers, these are dangerous and destroy huge trust system and can destroy our free speech. then that could be something people should be aware wheb using their service.
If I will be the campaign manager I will not have proven racists like HugeBlackWoman ThePharmacist or any one abusing the trust system or anyone supporting scammers. Post value will not spoil chipmixer like this ones but of course I will not want all from one group in meta who posts the same thing and fighting all times. Many are posting no valuable points of their own and a lot in meta. Chipmixer must be stupid to waste payment on chipmixer in meta on this rabble