I am a high quality well known poster with tons of history, I would never join this with the current requirements.
The price is low to average but the requirements are ridiculous.
I don't expect anyone with any decent reputation to agree to creating 5 topics a week. That is a spam topic madness that just won't fly. This has to be removed, the other requirements are weird too, first page only or up to third page, this just creates a race to post and lower quality replies. It's all junk and needs to be redone.
This is not a good start.
I'd expect a user who self-proclaims a great history of work on the forum to be able to quickly assess user behavior in content consumption on threads. It's typically limited to the first few, if not only the first, pages.
- Minimum 5 OP posts (Meaning threads created) every week.
- Minimum of 5 constructive posts on the first page of a thread.
- And an additional minimum of 10 more constructive posts up to the third page of a thread.
So you're looking for sixteen people to create between them a total of 80 new threads (every week) and then keep coming back to those threads week after week to effectively necro bump them if they are not popular. (Mods delete posts if the same poster posts days apart without any other poster participating, so you'll end up with participants posting "quality" posts only to have those posts deleted because no one else has posted.).
Ad visibility/exposure. If a topic takes off most people won't browse through all the posts, and regardless of the topic length, the first 1-3 pages are more likely to be seeing more views. Participants of campaigns with such rules can expect to be watched closely by users and mods alike.
Might want to re-think how your campaign is conducted.
Baseless assumption.
There is no claim of minimum bumps or views. Stop fabricating reality from your own narrow imagination.
Multiple accounts of OP? Did you forget to switch accounts? COO of Daomaker while OP post countless Daomaker threads. How is Daomaker involved with this?
OP will handle the campaign due to his experience with Bitcointalk.
I'm here representing BlockZone.
EDIT:
For some one so concerned with spam, you have an odd tendency to spam this thread, with multiple accounts might I add.
Constant statements irrelevant to application are not distant from qualifying as spam. If you have concerns, PM me.