This forum needs objective evidence of theft, violation of contractual agreements, or violation of applicable laws before negative rating or flagging in order to prevent abuse of the trust system that it self can be used to extort people into removing valid negative ratings or flags. Without this, it is a simple task to simply abuse the system to cover up crimes and abuses.
Last week you added this user to your trust list, I don't see how these negative ratings are valid according to your standards:
Troll, lied many time, called other russian DT members "corrupted", insulting and lying about trusted members of russian local board (as chimk). Consider crypto community as sectarians and bitcoin as a ponzie. Don't trust him.
2nd part of this one is Google translated from Russian:
A liar, a troll, is not responsible for his words, constantly translates arrows. Calls the crypto community sectarians. You cant trust
I collected every proof in one post (the only reason for second feedback). Liar, bitcoin hater. Don't have with him any deal without escrow!
2nd part also translated:
A slanderer is a rotten creature by definition. With him there is nothing to talk or argue about, on any topic, only you should not be smeared in feces. Brown, sticky and sticky. And it stinks. (c) Balthazar
Also translated:
The problem is not that you still had accounts, but that you brazenly lied in the face to those who respected you. "It was not the fact that you lied to me that shocked me, but the fact that I no longer believe you ..." Friedrich Nietzsche
Doesn't seem to be any objective evidence of theft, violation of contractual agreements, or violation of applicable laws there. Seems like you want to be the beneficiary of Objective Standards but you don't want to enforce them yourself -- especially when it gets in the way of your DT farming.
Of course, you're free to accuse me of digging through your shit, etc., or you could just explain why you included this user when they don't adhere to the standards you have presented.
There is nothing out of line with my standards.
3. Users who regularly and repeatedly ignore these standards should be excluded from trust lists.
If you examine the left ratings by the user "johhnyUA" you can see they make regular use of neutral ratings rather than negative ratings, which is quite appropriate.