Cmon, let him act on this one to show he stands behind his words.
Or maybe just let the topic die already since there's clearly nothing positive coming out of it? Objectivity was seemingly never the objective, heh.
Maybe you can throw some more circular logic at me. This forum needs objective evidence of theft, violation of contractual agreements, or violation of applicable laws before negative rating or flagging in order to prevent abuse of the trust system that it self can be used to extort people into removing valid negative ratings or flags. Without this, it is a simple task to simply abuse the system to cover up crimes and abuses.
Are you going to remove user Vispilio from your trust network because of his abusive trust rating?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5226886.msg53957784#msg53957784 -> please respond here.
Try to read and understand. Ask questions if you get stuck
This addressed and answers your question
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5226886.msg53961494#msg53961494Chipmixer spammers don't want to have any annoying transparent objective standards do they:)
The lists they cry... not daring to address the core principles. Pathetic Sig spamming scammer supporting weasels.
Focus on presenting a robust argument to retain your subjective red tags. That's the only power you have. Once there is a level playing field and you are held to the same transparent objective standards as every other member you are finished.