I recon the point of this thread is to provide enough evidence of Tecshare's trolling to get him banned? I'm sorry if you guys think that's the right thing to do, but I disagree. I've recently been one of his targets, and I don't feel like it's such a big deal. Like many other aspects of life, we will have to deal with misinformation, lies, and attacks. By leaving it to the community to decide whether there's any validity to his claims, we take the higher ground. By looking at
the DT1 list we can see that his efforts are not very successful.
Just thought this was relevant to the conversation:
I prefer to have an actual debate if my opponent is capable, but often they are not and resort to all kinds of illogical semantic games and personal attacks. At this point, yes I will absolutely troll them for my own amusement as well as to demonstrate their motivation of arguing from a position of lack of emotional control rather than logic. If you come at me with anything other than solid logic, one way or another I get my pound of flesh.
Of course, he is the arbiter of what constitutes "illogical semantic games and personal attacks," so he gets to decide when his trolling is justified and when it isn't.
It's really quite extraordinary how much deflection exists in that post you quoted. He'll attack people who disagree with him, call them names, refuse to see the logic in their arguments, and then point the finger at them and blame them for every thing for which he is guilty. But is that really enough of a reason to seek his banishment? Yes, it's true that he's a troll. One among a long list of trolls on this forum. This whole anti-Tecshare thing is starting to look like a witch hunt. I wish it would stop.