I'm not holding my breath.  Seems like there is a perfect 1-to-1 relationship between what the mainstream tells you to believe and what you believe.  If Big Bro tells you through an authorized channel (PBS, MSNBC, FOX, etc) that it looks like a chink weapon from their labs I'm sure you will have no problem finding all kinds of 'convincing evidence' for that.  Until then, it's bat soup.  Period.

For my part I've got no idea which lab it came from, but I'm quite sure that it (or they) came out of one.  I've for years understood why these labs exist and what they monkey around with.  It's also clear that these labs exchange data and biological materiel.  It's OK for you to see 'convincing evidence' of that since it was reported by our glorious mainstream media when the arrests and vial smuggling happened from Canada to China a month or two ago.

What I will do with the information from the article is to keep it in my mind and pattern-match the hypothesis against new observations as they come in.  That's kind of an old-school method of analysis, but it worked pretty well since the age of enlightenement so I'll stick with it.

---

BTW, .ca is for 'canada'.  Globalresearch.ca is not 'Chinese infowars'.  China (mainland) is .cn.  Globalresearch.ca is headed by some Canadian professor and they have been pretty focused on 'anti-globalization' for a long long time now.  Probably since you were still shitting soft.  I can understand how that might look 'anti-western' to people operating at a fairly simplistic level.