⭐ Merited by Foxpup (2)
I wouldn't surprised if it was deleted for being off-topic, but without any sort of context its hard to know for sure. Ergo, its removal is in no way "obviously" moderation abuse. Wonder why you didn't include the context.
LOL,
go post something in the topic, such as a comparison between Ethereum new PoS and should bitcoin adopt it, and soon zap!
You're talking about this section?
Quote
Development & Technical Discussion
Technical discussion about Satoshi's Bitcoin client and the Bitcoin network in general.
Technical discussion about Satoshi's Bitcoin client and the Bitcoin network in general.
What you're talking about sounds like it belongs in Altcoin Discussion.
Here you are, This is the context:
...
Satisfied Now? Op has included two links, I analyzed both. He has suggested re-considering Drive chain and Ln, I did it. Anything wrong from my side?
...
Satisfied Now? Op has included two links, I analyzed both. He has suggested re-considering Drive chain and Ln, I did it. Anything wrong from my side?
I can see your post being both on and off topic. Even though you are speaking for gmax (which is a bit weird and you could be totally wrong in your assessment of his words), you are addressing the first part of the topic, which is "about criticisms from the past (on Drivechain) from respected Bitcoin experts." The parts about Ethereum and your own "one-way sidechain solution" are off-topic.
Some moderators take the approach that so long as a post contains at least one on-topic element, even if the rest is irrelevant, then the post as a whole is deemed to be "on-topic." Some take the reverse approach. I don't think there's an absolute standard here.
I suppose you'll have to wait for clarification from gmax (or achow) as neither of us actually know what he's (they're) thinking.