Users shouldn't wait until they reach DT (and ideally it should work the other way around: people with valid ratings should be included).
This is what I've advocated. Logically, if you found out that someone was worthy of distrust, then you would want to note that for yourself. Since users are placed in DT0 by default, it shouldn't matter that other users don't see the feedback - the system in general is used to safeguard oneself from scammers and the like.
Yeh and then they worked feverishly for weeks to transcribe verbatim all of Lauda's negative trust feedback to ensure those who'd been on the receiving end remained showing negative trust by the DT1's.
Very few seem to have done due diligence and actually verified any of the instances of Red Paint he'd splashed around, however, now that you've re-found
the topic I've managed to Archive [
1a], [
1b] the various participants for future reference before the denials begin.
Cheers. I was a prominent member of
The Retaggening so if you find that any of
my feedback is misplaced, feel free to let me know so I can alter them.
I do not recall the series of events in full but I do remember examining each block of references for the various users (alt chains that linked to the same references were merely checked for username consistency after initial verification)