Hey, anti-vaxers, here is a challenge for you: I will publicly support you, if you will be the first to step up and declare that much though we may wish otherwise, we need some more dead kids in each generation—to prevent unlimited mass suffering and potential extinction in all the generations yet unborn.
I need not reach the question of how bad the side effects of vaccines are or aren’t. Of course, all medicines have side effects. Whether vaccines are benign except in a few rare, unfortunate cases, or causing widespread injuries about which The Truth is suppressed by The Medical Establishment, the answer is irrelevant to me.
[...] I don’t need to know medicine: I know history. People used to have eight, ten, or even twenty (yes, literally, twenty) kids with the knowledge that some would die, and others would survive...
tvbcof, want to take up my challenge here, where I can’t use self-mod powers to “censor” you? Stop being a wimp. Speak up for The Truth!
Glad to do it Mr. 'we need dead kids':
You guys crow all day long about being '
evidence based' and '
data driven', right? Well then, how about a vaxxed vs. non-vaxxed study to get some numbers?
It's actually a very simple study. Could at present be done to a statistically valid level by just evaluating existing data which is contained in secret databases. There is one catch:
- the study protocols need to be negotiated in public, the negotiations have to include individuals who are not tied to corp/gov and respected by us realskeptics, and there needs to be auditable assurance that the protocols are adhered to.
Such a study will never happen. The corp/gov bodies who hold all the power at present have said plain and simple that they will NEVER do such a study. It fairly obvious to me that the reason is that they know exactly what they will find and they have no interest in finding it.
They would find the same thing
this study found, except probably a lot worse.