Before I started managing the campaign for malubit.com, I looked at the issues that took place in their thread and it seemed clear to me that someone consciously wanted to slander his name.
I decided to objectively defend the name malubit.com with my alt account "dodgrad". I bet on malubit.com and everything is fine with me, which is also why I support this project.
I have neither broken the campaign rules nor the forum rules.
I can't say much about the other accounts except that they are not mine.
I decided to objectively defend the name malubit.com with my alt account "dodgrad". I bet on malubit.com and everything is fine with me, which is also why I support this project.
I have neither broken the campaign rules nor the forum rules.
I can't say much about the other accounts except that they are not mine.
Is this really objective? Even if you started before they approached you to run the campaign, you were still making plenty of posts afterwards. I don't believe that you weren't influenced by personal feelings or opinions as you have a clear financial incentive. Also, if you disliked that there were supposed alt accounts slandering them, was it really the best idea to use alt accounts to fight the slanderers? You're not exactly painting yourself in a positive light. Arguably, a bunch of your posts could be considered paid bumps too such as this one.
In fact, I unfortunately used the word "objectively". Of course, working for malubit.com is not completely objective. It was rather a defense of my employer, so partly also my name. This is obvious.
In terms of activity, it was not a bump, but a normal bet:
It's true that the "dodgrad" account is my alt account. <...>
In that case, kotwica666 was cheating regularly, by enrolling his main and alt account dodgrad at the same bounties, violating campaign rules:
- Byteball Twitter Campaign (posts 14 & 65). Rule: "1 acct per user"
- BITWIN Signature Campaign (posts 682 & 728). Rule: "2. The use of several accounts, any cheating, spamming or unethical behaviour will disqualify you from any of the bounties."
The account was not in my hands in these campaigns.
- ETH - 4TH QUARTER PRICE PREDICTION [GAME] (posts 73 & 81). Rule: "No Alt Accounts"
- ChipMixer Signature Campaign (posts). Rule: "5. Enrolling alts will result in both of your accounts removed without payment."
- ChipMixer Signature Campaign (posts). Rule: "5. Enrolling alts will result in both of your accounts removed without payment."
Here I have to admit that I did it consciously. In this way, I increased my chances and cheated the community.
For excuse, I was unable to get into the campaign and I had practically no chance of it, of which I was aware.
I apologize everyone for that.
I'm sorry.