On the contrary, I do have a problem with that, that's why I've been asking you shills for months to use sources and quotes when trying to refute something. Instead you resort to baseless claims and spam, so @AC keeps posting the same signature. 
He was very clear about his intents. Why would he have to go through same stuff if you simply back up your claims? Obvisouly he wouldn't "spam" as you call it. You shills are the ones not wanting to discuss anything for months, all you presented is your "opinion". 
We are running in circles and you pretend like it's not because of your constant spam and ad-hominem. I already asked what is it that you are trying to accomplish if you don't back-up your claims?

Actually I remember that you yourself did try to discuss something in the past, but your attempts were poor and quotes you provided were ambiguous, thus refuted. 
But recently joined shill-cavalry provided no sources at all. So props to you for actually trying, but you were refuted with quotes as far as I remember. 

So I invite you yet again to stop with ad-hominem and baseless claims, and if you want to refute something, do it with quotes instead of fairy-dust. 
Obviously your next posts will also be some kind of spam, as history teaches us.