I vaguely recall one of the merit fonts getting busted for doing pretty much the same thing not that long ago and the response was they are a merit source and can divvy up the merits as they wish.
A merit source was sending merits to their alt account? Which one? That's even worse than a DT including their alt account in their trust list.
Ouch! I can only assume that was a passing shot at Timelord Jr? You should always add any mobile account you use that's insecure by default into your distrust list, no questions.
[/off topic]
Both of you might want to read this before you further embarrass yourself:
Do's and Don'ts
- It's okay to include your alt-account on your own Trust list. This means you trust the feedback you left from that account. Example:Quotehilariousandco Trusts these users' judgement:
7. hilariousetc (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (1725 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP) - Don't include your main account from your alt account(s). This could influence DT1-voting, and although that's not part of this guide, it's bad.
But I never said a merit font was giving their alt any merits - they were busted for handing out 50 merits in one go - that's what the topic of this thread is about - nutildah is trying to rewrite history.
Interesting. I don't feel embarrassed, I feel like trusting your alt account that you yourself identify as insecure is embarrassing in itself.
Thanks for bringing this to my attention, any other mobile alts you know of that I can add to my mobile's distrust list?
PS - It's not that I can't read, it's that I haven't read every single feedback left on here to know that information
Thanks again!