I'm not sure how well you or the goose who posted above can read English, poorly it seems?

But if you could comprehend what I wrote you will see that I said:

" So at least it's fair to say that part of this exchange definitely isn't a scam."

I never suggested anything about the whole exchange being a scam or not. This is the reason I take no weight from the trigger happy mob that posts their opinions without doing much research in this section of the forum. I consider most of you imature noobs.

I also said:

"it's fair to say that 90% of the crypto world is scams"

So don't make yourself feel good if you get one right although your research and facts are non existent because the bookies are not taking any bets on any projects being a scam or not as 90% is probably an understatement.

You can read through all my other posts here and what you will find is I was just discussing the allegations and asking for more evidence as I was considering investing which I didn't in the end and that wasn't because of the dribble written by noobs in this thread, I done my own research.

Still was never given any evidence about how the apparent owner the "super scammer" is either the owner or history of being a scammer. I'm just expected to believe what some trigger happy 14yo keyboard warrior has to say.

For the record my opinions are:

-Fake volumes doesn't mean scam, most exchanges pump fake volumes and it seems new exchanges nearly also have to so they can compete.

- Exchanges have the right to name their listing fees. If you have 100k to be able to afford to pay such a fee but your smart enough to do the research and spend your 100k poorly, then your probably retarded and didn't deserve your money anyway. Plenty of dollars but no cents you might say......

I'm sure you find a lot of people feel that the allegations on here are not worth reading and your better off doing your own research because the standard set by the trigger happy noobs here is rated "F" due to poor facts to rely upon.